Member-only story

Claude 3.5: The AI That Rules Software Benchmarks and Redefines Computer Control (Anthropic)

Techmade
3 min readDec 7, 2024

In the rapidly evolving AI landscape, Anthropics’ latest innovation, Claude 3.5, has emerged as a game-changer. This state-of-the-art language model outpaces GPT-4.0 on nearly every significant benchmark, claiming the crown for software engineering prowess. But it’s not just about benchmarks — Claude introduces a revolutionary (and controversial) feature that pushes AI into uncharted territory: full control over your computer.

Benchmark Brilliance: Why Claude 3.5 Reigns Supreme

Claude 3.5 has swept benchmarks, outperforming GPT-4.0 in areas like graduate-level reasoning, programming, and visual question answering. On the software engineering benchmark, it solved 49% of GitHub issues, setting a new standard for real-world applicability. However, while it lags slightly in mathematical tasks compared to Google’s Gemini 1.5, it dominates most other categories.

Yet, the competition isn’t static. Comparisons to OpenAI’s latest GPT-4.01, which employs advanced techniques like Chain of Thought (CoT) for auto-reprompting, suggest the race for supremacy remains fierce.

The Game-Changing “Computer Use” Feature

What truly sets Claude 3.5 apart isn’t its academic performance — it’s its ability to physically interact with a computer environment. The new “computer use” API enables developers to command Claude to perform tasks as if it were a human user. Here’s how it works:

  1. Multi-Step Problem Solving
    Claude performs iterative actions: analyzing the screen, identifying interface elements, and executing commands. It loops through this process until achieving the desired outcome or encountering an error.
  2. Applications in Action
    From web scraping to financial modeling, the possibilities are immense:
  • Web Scraping: Claude…

--

--

Techmade
Techmade

Written by Techmade

Learn how to land a job in tech and grow to a senior software engineer in big tech or startups.

No responses yet

Write a response